10 movies we can’t wait for in 2019

news image

2018 was a whirlwind, but we still got some epic movies out of the madness. 

2019 promises the same, with pivotal sequels, live-action reboots, books adapted for the screen – and new, original movies that might just blow us away.

Here are the top 10 movies we’re looking forward to in 2019.

1. Us – March 15

Starring Lupita Nyong’o and Winston Duke, Us is the story of a couple visiting a childhood home – but in true Peele fashion, it’s also a psychological thriller, a monster movie, and probably a welcome subversion of the horror genre.

Audiences didn’t know what to expect with Peele’s directorial debut Get Out blew away audiences and critics alike in 2017. This time around we consider ourselves prepared – if only for the collective gasps of our fellow theatergoers and to leave the experience feeling profoundly fucked up in the best way.

2. Avengers: Endgame – April 26

We don’t have any time to pretend we’re not shaking in our boots at the prospect of the fourth O.G. Avengers film. Thanos killed half of our friends and the rest are extremely traumatized and/or trapped in space! We gotta get rid of this guy and get our heroes back. Shoutout to Captain Marvel who will undoubtedly save the day and also has her own movie out just a few months earlier. 

3. Men in Black: International – June 14

Chris Hemsworth and Tessa Thompson suit up as Men in Black agents in this prequel film about the organization that tracks aliens on Earth. Early behind-the-scenes looks (courtesy of social media) teased Thompson and Hemsworth falling into their established Ragnarok chemistry, and the trailer proves we’re in for another memorable romp with these two and some intergalactic enemies.

4. Toy Story 4 – June 21

The fourth Toy Story movie will arrive a decade after its predecessor, a film so emotionally pitch perfect that we’re still recovering from its achievement. The toys will return for this enigmatic film, joined by an adorable spork with enough self-awareness to realize that he’s the one thing that’s not like these others.

5. The Lion King – July 19

We’ve been sweating with anticipation for this movie ever since the casting went public, and that jaw-dropping teaser only stoked the flames. In the words of a famous lion cub, we just can’t wait.

6. It: Chapter II – Sept. 6

Andy Muschietti’s adaptation of the Stephen King horror novel was one of 2017’s unexpected hits, and though we’re terrified to journey back to Derry with adult Losers, we’re ready nonetheless. The cast is already out of Twitter’s dreams – including Bill Hader as Richie and Jessica Chastain as Beverly – with Bill Skarsgård reprising his role as voracious demon Pennywise. 

7. The Kitchen – Sept. 20

Image: mashable composite/shutterstock

Melissa McCarthy, Tiffany Haddish, and Elisabeth Moss team up as mob wives in the 1970s in this crime movie we somehow have to wait nine months for. The trio take over  the neighborhood after their husbands are taken into custody by the FBI.

8. Last Christmas – Nov. 15

Here’s the breakdown: Emilia Clarke. Henry Golding. Michelle Yeoh. Rom-com. Script by Emma Thompson, directed by Paul Feig. We’re in.

9. Star Wars Episode IX – Dec. 20

The final installment of the trilogy that began in 2015 draws to a close with (hopefully) answers about Rey, Finn, Poe, and Kylo Ren – with the fate of the Jedi and the First Order shaping the future of our favorite distant galaxy.

10. Always Be My Maybe – TBD

Comedian Ali Wong and 'Fresh Off the Boat' actor Randall Park will play the romantic leads of Netflix's 'Always Be My Maybe.'

Comedian Ali Wong and ‘Fresh Off the Boat’ actor Randall Park will play the romantic leads of Netflix’s ‘Always Be My Maybe.’

Image: mashable composite/shutterstock

This Ali Wong-penned romcom starring Wong and Randall Park stars the duo as childhood sweethearts who reconnect after 15 years apart. The cast includes Keanu Reeves, Daniel Dae Kim, Michelle Buteau, Deadpool‘s Karan Soni, and more. That’s literally all we know and enough for us to need it desperately.

Https%3a%2f%2fblueprint api production.s3.amazonaws.com%2fuploads%2fvideo uploaders%2fdistribution thumb%2fimage%2f90084%2f47b31934 5b6f 4cbd 8991 77f105ad4de1

Read More

from Trendy News Day http://bit.ly/2ETZVKf
via IFTTT

The meaning of Netflix’s ‘Bird Box’ cannot be explained

news image

Might as well ask this bird what Netflix's Bird Box is about.
Might as well ask this bird what Netflix’s Bird Box is about.

Image: Merrick Morton/Netflix

Warning: Light spoilers for Bird Box lie ahead.

Welcome to Bird Box analysis, where the metaphors are made up and the points don’t matter!

Look. I like a return-to-English-class breakdown of a horror movie as much as the next gal—but this is getting ridiculous. Since Sandra Bullock’s Netflix debut, Bird Box, started streaming last Friday, folks have gone absolutely batshit trying to explain whatever happens to her and her kids in this post-apocalyptic nightmare. 

What do the monsters represent? What do the blindfolds mean? How many grocery store parrots does it take to screw in a lightbulb? Etc., etc. 

According to some, Bird Box represents the fear of becoming a parent. Others says it’s a scathing reflection on white privilege. Some claim it’s a cautionary tale about social media. And plenty of viewers argue it’s a faith-filled religious allegory. 

Now, that’s all well and good, but after having seen Bird Box three times in the past week I can definitively tell you: We are never going to know what this movie was about. Absolutely no one knows for sure. We can all go home now. Thanks everyone for your valiant efforts.

That’s not to say Bird Box doesn’t have an intended meaning. Clearly author Josh Malerman knows the deeper themes of his own work, and presumably director Susanne Bier and screenwriter Eric Heisserer had their own organized theses when they began adapting Malerman’s book for Netflix. 

However, whatever master plan this trio cooked up behind closed doors isn’t being conveyed clearly to streamers itching for answers—even those of us who parsed through multiple viewings. 

Whether that’s because Bird Box is a masterful, cinematic Rorschach test revealing hidden subconscious truths of the viewer or a jumbled mess of mixed metaphors is up for debate. But so far, one thing is clear: Anyone who is confused about Bird Box is likely going to stay confused about Bird Box.

So, what can be done for those of us aimlessly searching for answers like a blindfolded mother of two looking for a row boat? Well, here are a few options. 

1. Continue to fight it out like a bunch of birds in boxes. 

Honestly, this has been pretty fun holiday dinner table fodder and it’s at least better than talking politics. So, I guess if we’re stuck in an elaborate Yanny or Laurel style debate forever, then that’s probably fine.

2. Cross our fingers that Netflix will do some kind of post-release explainer so we can all take a friggin’ nap. 

Not unlike the release date of Stranger Things Season 3, Netflix has this answer. Maybe they’ll share?

3. Wait for Stephen King to settle it for us. 

Dear Mr. The King of Horror: 

Please consider doing a Ted Talk on the subject. It would be a public service.

All the best,
Everyone

4. Focus on the true meaning of Christmas aka Trevante Rhodes being hot as hell.

Missy Elliott, as always, nails the main takeaway. 

5. Do this all over again when (and if) we get a sequel. 

Same time next year, I guess?

Https%3a%2f%2fblueprint api production.s3.amazonaws.com%2fuploads%2fvideo uploaders%2fdistribution thumb%2fimage%2f90087%2ff5f66956 2268 4d21 8e99 6158f75a656a

Read More

from Trendy News Day http://bit.ly/2LEjmrU
via IFTTT

The only good part of the winter are these capybaras in a yuzu bath

news image

This is One Good Thing, a weekly column where we tell you about one of the few nice things that happened this week.


Baths are an extremely overrated form of self-care: they’re often too warm, incredibly filthy, and loaded with foul bacteria.

Meanwhile, baths for nature’s most underrated animal, the capybara, provide plenty of soothing both for the animal and for the sad human voyeur.

I’m a particular fan of this video of capybaras soaking in a yuzu bath which went viral this week, and for which we should all be grateful.

Every year for the winter solstice, zookeepers at multiple zoos across Japan soak capybaras in yuzu baths. The tradition started at Izu Shaboten Zoo in 1996 and has since taken off, though the practice has been used as a way to ward off illness for centuries.

It’s unclear how effective these baths are, but who cares? It’s cute AF and we all deserve something cute AF in our lives.

Yuzus are a citrusy fruit frequently used by the more highbrow contestants on the Great British Baking Show

Indulge your deepest anthropomorphic fantasies and look at how happy it makes them:

Enormous furry rats deserve self-care too. Thank you to the zookeepers who gave joy to these creatures as well as the voyeuristic humans who love them. 

Https%3a%2f%2fblueprint api production.s3.amazonaws.com%2fuploads%2fvideo uploaders%2fdistribution thumb%2fimage%2f90087%2ff5f66956 2268 4d21 8e99 6158f75a656a

Read More

from Trendy News Day http://bit.ly/2ETyC2K
via IFTTT

How Benedict Cumberbatch transformed himself into the mastermind behind Brexit

news image

Regardless of what side of the proverbial Brexit fence you’re sitting on, I think there’s one thing we can all agree on: things are a little bit of a mess right now. In the past few weeks alone, it’s been an exceptionally tumultuous time in UK politics — from a leadership challenge to the growing prospect of leaving the EU without a deal. 

But, just when you thought you couldn’t bear to hear that cursed six-letter b-word again, Channel 4 is serving up a dollop of referendum-themed drama starring Benedict Cumberbatch and Rory Kinnear. 

The idea of sitting through a fictionalised version of how the Brexit sausage got made is probably enough to make any of us expire through sheer exasperation. Brexit: The Uncivil War is a feature film delving into the data-driven political campaign behind the most seismic and divisive referendum in modern British history. Cumberbatch stars as Vote Leave’s campaign director Dominic Cummings — a man David Cameron is said to have called a “career psychopath” and who many Remainers might consider a real-life villain. Cumberbatch’s rendering of the political strategist behind the operation is slightly more nuanced and, well, unvillain-like, however. 

Benedict Cumberbatch as Dominic Cummings.

Benedict Cumberbatch as Dominic Cummings.

When the trailer for Brexit dropped, an almighty uproar descended as many viewers felt the trailer smacked of glamorisation of a figure who spearheaded a campaign that was subsequently found to be in breach of electoral law. Among other criticisms, there’s also, ya know, the fact that we’re still actually living through Brexit — and the outcome is, to a certain extent, still up in the air. Too soon?

“Whether he was motivated by political ambition or not, by the time I met him, I met an incredibly happy man who certainly wasn’t posing.”

Despite being a Remainer himself, Cumberbatch wanted to show the human side of Cummings. He brings Sherlockian elements into his portrayal — you see Cummings sitting in a broom cupboard in the dark, scribbling his musings onto the door. You see him, in the very nascent beginnings of the campaign, calling out the names of famous leaders from history to draw inspiration from their leadership strategy. Is this the work a somewhat scruffy, understated genius or the self-aware musings of a pseudo-intellectual? Hard to tell. 

The real-life Cummings hired Canadian digital firm AggregateIQ — a company that reportedly had “undisclosed links” to Cambridge Analytica — to unleash targeted political advertising on Facebook. Cummings was quoted on AIQ’s website as saying, “we couldn’t have done it without them,” and attributes the success of the Leave campaign to AIQ’s contributions. 

The Vote Leave campaign was this year found to have broken electoral law by the UK’s Electoral Commission after a nine month investigation. The investigation found that Vote Leave broke the law by exceeding its £7MM spending limit by channelling £675,000 into a pro-leave youth group. 

A 'Vote LEAVE' battle bus is parked outside the Houses of Parliament in Westminster.

A ‘Vote LEAVE’ battle bus is parked outside the Houses of Parliament in Westminster.

Image: Jack Taylor/Getty Images

So, how exactly does one go about trying to get inside the head of the man who spearheaded the aforementioned campaign? Simple. Cumberbatch went and met him, of course.

Screenwriter James Graham told Mashable that Cummings was reluctant to meet initially because he was concerned the script would be heavily pro-Remain — an idea Cummings was eventually disabused of. When Cumberbatch finally met Cummings, he met a man who, funnily enough, was pretty unhappy about the way Brexit was panning out. 

“Whether he was motivated by political ambition or not, by the time I met him, I met an incredibly happy man who certainly wasn’t posing,” said Cumberbatch. “He seemed to be incredibly content being at home with his family. So I was surprised but I didn’t feel I was meeting a politico.”

“I felt I was meeting someone who still had great convictions and idealism who is pretty distraught about how it’s turning out,” Cumberbatch continued. “That was in the summer and he was most distraught about what he felt he wasn’t being delivered because of the way the politics was grinding down the results in his eyes.”

“I felt I was meeting someone who still had great convictions and idealism who is pretty distraught about how it’s turning out.”

But, aside from his current take on how Brexit’s going, Cumberbatch also wanted to get inside Cummings’ headspace to understand questions like: “What makes you tick? Who inspired you at school? What’s your favourite colour? Do you prefer bitter or lager? Who do you support? Are you a swimmer or a walker? What do you do to burn off steam?” 

Cumberbatch also watched two pieces of footage of the man himself on Youtube ad nauseum to try to mimic his mannerisms, posture, and his “very particular Durham dialect,” and “his way of holding himself in public.” And he spoke to staff who worked alongside Cummings on the campaign to gain an idea of what the man was like behind closed doors. “One of the most striking things was how calm and composed they said he was throughout the entire campaign,” said Cumberbatch. “He has a very even spirit level.”

Watching Brexit: The Uncivil War you’ll notice the campaign directors of Remain and Leave are agreed on one thing: regarding Brexit as a binary is very misguided. Both appear to agree that it’s more nuanced and complicated than that. Your relationship with this film will likely be just as complicated. 

Https%3a%2f%2fblueprint api production.s3.amazonaws.com%2fuploads%2fvideo uploaders%2fdistribution thumb%2fimage%2f87094%2f50d30717 1578 4ee4 b844 4529cb6e5ea0

Read More

from Trendy News Day http://bit.ly/2BKGjoS
via IFTTT

In a year of crisis points for influencers, YouTube also tried to do some good

news image

2018 was not what you would call a great year for the world’s largest video platform, nor for some of the influencers who use it to make a living. 

Case in point: the Logan Paul incident. The YouTube star caused widespread anger when he uploaded a video that included footage of a body of person who died of suicide in the Aokigahara forrest in Japan to his – at the time – 15 million subscribers, most of whom are tweens

This incident, which only hurt Paul in the immediate term (he now has over 18 million subscribers) highlighted some fundamental challenges facing YouTube; managing user-generated content on a platform that prides itself as democratic, filtering content to young users and relying too much on their algorithms alone to police, monitor, and push content

However, in the midst of all of this, 2018 was also the year that YouTube increased its funding for its Creators for Change initiative, a program that provides production and marketing support to a select, diverse group of YouTube creators to harness the power of the platform to bring about positive change. 

“As a global platform, we need to lift up the voices who are committed to exploring and encouraging positive social change.”

This seems like a neat antidote to the rogue content and slew of bad stories about the platform; funding quality content that shows YouTube is about more than just generating views by any means necessary. According to YouTube, though, Creators for Change is not a look-over-here manoeuvre; it is an attempt to amplify the voices of creators using the platform to inflict social change. 

“We recognise that as a global platform, we need to lift up the voices who are committed to exploring and encouraging positive social change,” a YouTube spokesperson writes in an email to Mashable. 

This year, that has resulted in a wide range of content from 31 creators world wide. Here in the UK, two such creators are Humza Productions, who used the program to make Boys Don’t Cry, a short film exploring toxic masculinity, and beauty vlogger My Pale Skin, who made Redefine Pretty, a film about social media’s negative effect on body image. 

Another is Riyadh Khalaf, a 27-year-old YouTube content creator, journalist and radio host who used the initiative to pursue his dream of producing a documentary film.

Through Creators for Change, Khalaf produced Fighting for Pride, a 30 minute documentary about LGBTQ activists trying to arrange the first pride in the African country of Swaziland. 

For him, Creators for Change represents more than an exercise in moving attention away from the platforms negative issues. It represents a chance for the YouTube community to prove that their work on the platform can be positive.

“[Creators for Change] shows the power of storytelling on YouTube,” Khalaf told Mashable. “We’re hitting back with content that is positive. I still truly believe that the good on the platform way, way, way outweighs the bad.”

Khalaf sees it as a way for YouTube and the community to celebrate the voices who have a “genuine, honest desire to make positive change.”

“Naturally, in an open ecosystem where media can be uploaded […] by any person, you’re going to get certain content, that isn’t positive,” Riyadh said. “But that’s not the identity of the platform. It’s so much broader and so much better.”

Riyadh Khalaf is one of YouTube's Creators for Change

Riyadh Khalaf is one of YouTube’s Creators for Change

Image: Brian de Rivera Simon/Getty Images 

A YouTube spokesperson told Mashable that “Creators for Change is not an excuse or diversion tactic about sometimes surprising or inappropriate content on YouTube.”

“For us, Creators for Change is about fostering an open, encouraging and safer global community on YouTube,” the spokesperson said. “As ever, we do not allow videos that incite hatred or promote violence on YouTube and we work hard to remove infringing content quickly, through investments in machine learning and hiring more people.”

You can watch all of the Creators for Change content here.

If you want to talk to someone or are experiencing suicidal thoughts, text the Crisis Text Line at 741-741 or call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-8255. For international resources, this list is a good place to start.

Https%3a%2f%2fblueprint api production.s3.amazonaws.com%2fuploads%2fvideo uploaders%2fdistribution thumb%2fimage%2f90044%2fcf50e5f4 8268 475a ae72 8e72f2334260

Read More

from Trendy News Day http://bit.ly/2Av3GmH
via IFTTT

Marijuana representation on screen: There’s still a long way to go

news image

This post is part of our High-tech High series, which explores weed innovations, and our cultural relationship with cannabis, as legalization in several U.S. states, Canada, and Uruguay moves the market further out of the shadows.


Marijuana has long been celebrated in the world of music and song. In the world of movies and TV, meanwhile, the majority of cannabis-loving characters tend to slot in somewhere between bumbling idiots and dangerous outcasts. 

This divide in media representation stretches all the way back to 1936. That was the year a hit jazz song called “If You’re a Viper” provided a positive view of marijuana use that still checks out (“you know you’re high when your throat is dry / everything is dandy”). But it was also the year of Reefer Madness, the infamous propaganda film that depicted pot as a precursor to lunacy and murder; its users were crazed buffoons to be laughed at or pitied.

Fast forward 82 years. Even after widespread legalization and societal acceptance of weed, it doesn’t seem like much has changed. Because yes, marijuana in music is cooler than ever; a recent study found that 75 percent of U.S. top 40 tunes feature positive shout-outs to weed — often for enhancing the creativity or prowess of the songwriter. 

But on screens? Well, even including recent indie movies that landed with a thud (see: Hansel and Gretel Get Baked), our cinematic cannabis canon contains a litany of bro-tastic stoner dudes on couches. The pot smoker is here presented as a hapless fool who keeps getting into scrapes — all brought on, in the immortal words of Afroman, because they got high. (Not to mention hungry.) 

Which is not to say stoner comedies can’t be funny. They’re often hilarious! Take the negative sides of heavy pot-smoking — short-term memory loss, paranoia, poor motor skills — exaggerate them, and you have seams of comedy gold for talented moviemakers to mine.

It’s just that, well, we’ve seen that movie so many times. What Cheech and Chong were doing in Up in Smoke in the 1970s is pretty much what Harold and Kumar did in the 2000s, and what Seth Rogen and James Franco did earlier this decade in Pineapple Express and This is the End, not to mention Mark Wahlberg and a CGI bear in the two Teds. If we’re going to keep doing this, Hollywood, how about some more female leads in stoner comedies? 

If a character gets high in a comedy, it’s generally shorthand for them being a doofus. If they get high in a drama, it’s still code for them being a weird outcast. They may be the hero or a sidekick, but there’s definitely something wrong with them — some kind of arrested development.

Granted, screenwriters don’t always show alcohol in the best light either; we have the Hangover movies as Exhibits A-C there. But at least there’s more balance, even romance, in its portrayal. For every drunk-ass W.C. Fields, there’s a suave Jay Gatsby or James Bond. (Alcohol, which has been found to do more damage to your brain than marijuana in at least one recent study, is surely less deserving of this fair and balanced treatment.) 

And yes, you could argue that alcohol and weed have differing impacts psychologically, but if we can embrace both James Bond and the Hangover bros, we should make room for more nuanced portrayals of weed, too. Yet we more readily think of grand old celebrities who can hold their liquor and use it in their performance — Peter O’Toole being the archetypal example. For the equivalent in the marijuana-user world, you’d have to look to the music business again; someone like Paul McCartney, casual consumer of at least one joint a day since 1965, has no equivalent in movies. 

For a brief time in the 20th century, cinematic stoner heroes could be cool, too (see Easy Rider for the best example). But in the 21st, there is no sign of a mainstream movie hero that can do for weed what Bond did for martinis — that is, to portray it as a refined pleasure often consumed socially. 

Not a central part of the plot, nor an important flaw in the main character (as marijuana was for Joaquin Phoenix’s detective in Inherent Vice) — just a totally legal thing people happen to do on an evening, without it necessarily turning them into the Big Lebowski. 

When someone like Daniel Craig appears in a movie as a character who takes a languid hit off a vape pen and nothing more is said of it, that’s when you know Hollywood is taking weed seriously. (Appropriately enough, Craig opened his 2004 movie Layer Cake doing a long monologue about future drug legalization and how it would prevent mobsters like his character; it’s looking more prescient with each passing year.) 

Good joints, bad joints

Our ongoing Golden Age of Television should provide us with more nuanced portrayals of marijuana usage, right? Well, yes. Sort of. With big caveats.

TV went to pot relatively late in the game, and seemed cautious about putting cannabis front and center in the story even when it went there. The highly bingeable eight seasons of Weeds (2005-2012) made a lot of peripheral use of the plant, and had plenty of marijuana users who weren’t clowns or weirdos. 

But the show was also oddly clear about the fact that its hero Nancy Botwin (the peerless Mary Louise Parker) rarely got high on her own supply. She was just a suburban mom, forced into dealing the green stuff by circumstance. Her personal drug of choice: venti frappuccinos. 

Then there was Broad City, which successfully updated the stoner comedy concept for the small screen (and gave us the female protagonists that the movie business didn’t). Tellingly, Broad City was not developed by network executives, but was born as a series of web shorts. Season 5 will be the last, and attempts to spin off the same schtick into other formats — such as co-creator Ilana Glazer’s short-lived Time Traveling Bong — haven’t gone anywhere so far. 

More problematic were the two seasons of Disjointed (2017 and 2018) on Netflix. Kathy Bates stars as Ruth Whitefeather Feldman, proprietor of a recreational dispensary in Los Angeles, ringleader of a motley crew of stoners including her son and his crush. Netflix opted not to pick it up a third time. And it’s not hard to see why.

Disjointed is, as its title suggests, a strange show and something of a mixed baggie. It is a very 20th century-style studio sitcom, complete with a laugh track. Nothing wrong with that — it’s actually great that pot got its mainstream laugh-track workplace sitcom, its Cheers moment at last. Move over, alcohol! The problem is more that this format seems to have led the writers to go for the weaker, safer, more frequent kind of jokes, usually ones that reinforce marijuana stereotypes. 

Take Disjointed‘s two most clownish, over-indulging stoner characters, Dank and Dabby. In the Season 1 finale — spoiler alert, I guess? — this couple gets stuck on the roof of the dispensary, and we learn what happens when they’re deprived of weed for a few hours: They remember their former lives as academic geniuses. 

It’s intended as a joke, of course, but suddenly Dank and Dabby become tragic figures, chronic underachievers, no less victims of the demon weed than any character in Reefer Madness

Still, there’s a lot to commend the show for in terms of representation. Ruth’s son Travis, a black man, is also that rarest of characters: a rational, normal, non-hippyish, level-headed, business-running, occasional marijuana user. There’s Maria, a suburban mom who takes to vaping with the zeal of the convert. 

And then there’s Carter, the Iraq vet security guard whose internal struggles with PTSD are illustrated with dramatic, trippy animations. His journey, from adamantly refusing to even try pot to discovering that it quiets the bad stuff in his head, is the most touching arc on the show. Carter, a Muslim, is by far the most complex character; had he been the focus of Disjointed, Netflix may not have canceled it. 

Maintenance Man

A more successful show, and the only one to truly represent marijuana users on a regular basis, is High Maintenance — which returns for a third season on HBO on January 20, 2019. 

Like Broad City and unlike Disjointed, which was a top-down network-style show from Big Bang Theory guys, High Maintenance floated from the bottom up — starting life as a series of web shorts on Vimeo. At the risk of sounding like a pretentious hipster, the old, obscure ones are still clearly the best; a 15-minute format is the way the show should have stayed.

Each webisode was utterly fresh, a realistic slice of life of a different quirky New Yorker. At some point in the story, usually incidental to the action, each character receives a weed delivery from a bearded bike messenger known only as The Guy (Ben Sinclair). 

In these shorts, The Guy was often the foil for the strangeness of his clients; he was a very New York type himself, a working dealer hustling to make a buck, and he bowed out quick.

When the show stepped up to HBO, a half-hour runtime requirement created a need to stitch the short stories together. The Guy became that stitching, and started to look like more of an eternal stoner type in the process: smoking out with his clients every episode, taking mushrooms and running around the city, and in the final episode of Season 2, even revealing that he has a name. (Unimaginatively, it’s Ben.)  

But the show has opened up a seam of storytelling about New York City, one of the richest character mines in the world. It could dig for years and keep coming up with gold — because how many millions of New Yorkers continue to need a Guy, in the absence of legalization? (New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo has called for legalizing recreational marijuana in 2019, but nobody knows yet whether he’ll actually follow through or is just associating himself with a popular program.) 

Nearly every High Maintenance character is striving for something that makes them sympathetic. They’re trying to make it in the big city, to create something, to find themselves, find love or explore a new fad. They are flawed and fascinating and just so happen to need, or like, the flawed, fascinating uplift that THC provides. They read the news today, oh boy (as in the Season 2 opener, which deals with a never-specified international catastrophe) and they’d love to turn you on. 

In terms of anti-fascist political messages, however, there’s nothing to beat Reefer Madness. Not the 1936 version — the 1998 musical parody, immortalized in an Emmy-winning 2005 Showtime movie starring Alan Cumming and Kristen Bell. 

The musical is mostly 1936 propaganda exaggerated to absurdity. An opening number warns that marijuana is “turning all our children into hooligans and whores.” A gangster’s moll laments her addiction to “The Stuff.” Young innocent Mary Sunshine (Bell) has a handful of puffs and turns into an insatiable dominatrix. 

The American president himself (Cumming) shows up at the end to tell everyone how to combat the green menace. And then comes the sting in the musical’s tale: Once they’ve rounded up all the pot-smoking freaks, the cast vows, it’s time to round up everyone who deviates from the norm based on race and religion as well. 

It’s fair to say this ending is rather more resonant in 2018 than it was in 1998. Life may be good for American stoners in some states right now, but others are still getting arrested and incarcerated by a plainly racist justice system

The public may no longer associate marijuana with Mexican immigrants, as they did during the early part of the 20th century. Nevertheless, the current president squeaked into office after demonizing Mexicans for bringing unspecified “drugs and crime.” Fear of The Other is alive and well, and remains a factor in marijuana policy. 

We really aren’t as far away from 1936 as we think, both on screen and in real life. But if moviemakers and showrunners can give us more than stoner comedy tropes, if they can stop giggling for long enough to give us more even-handed, realistic representations of a mostly harmless intoxicant, then society at large will follow. 

Https%3a%2f%2fblueprint api production.s3.amazonaws.com%2fuploads%2fvideo uploaders%2fdistribution thumb%2fimage%2f86974%2f177acf6f c0a8 4e86 8438 838b62525dd1

Read More

from Trendy News Day http://bit.ly/2EUyWOF
via IFTTT

Elon Musk’s Twitter in 2018: Lawsuits, dank memes, and ‘funding secured’

news image

Musk has tweets for everything.
Musk has tweets for everything.

Image: mashable composite: ROBYN BECK/AFP/Getty Images / twitter

What better way to really understand Elon Musk’s year as Tesla CEO than to look back at his Twitter. It’s been a bumpy and very busy year for the electric car executive. He went from the depths of despair to turning a profit for Tesla for the first time — with a few lawsuits and scathing news reports thrown in for good measure. He even took a few puffs of marijuana on a podcast.

His most famous tweet of 2018? 

That led to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit and possible criminal investigation. In his settlement (which cost him $20 million and Tesla another $20 million), he was removed as chairman of the board and his tweeting is now under close watch. That didn’t stop him from taunting the SEC. He remains CEO of Tesla.

Before the SEC drama in August, he divulged he was in “production hell” as he struggled to build 5,000 Model 3 cars a week. We learned Musk was sleeping at the office.

As Musk himself said in a Halloween interview with Recode’s Kara Swisher, “It’s fair to say I would probably not have tweeted some of the things I tweeted, that was probably unwise.”

Back in May, he went on a rant about creating a truth-rating website called Pravda.

Later, he broke down in a New York Times article, calling this year the “most difficult and painful year of my career.” BUT HE DID NOT CRY.

And he’s still dealing with the repercussions of an insulting (since deleted) tweet calling a British cave diver a “pedo guy.” The diver is suing for defamation. Musk argued this week that since it happened on Twitter it’s protected speech.

Musk also used Twitter to make countless product announcements, from off-menu paint colors to updated Autopilot software. He tweeted about a farting unicorn and gave his cars the ability to fart. He also gave clues about major releases, like the elusive Model Y.

Tesla’s stock price is a good indicator of when Musk’s Twitter behavior is getting too much for shareholders to handle. The dips match low points in his tweets, IRL behavior, and Model 3 production numbers.

A year of Tesla.

A year of Tesla.

Musk’s personal life got even weirder this year. In February he broke up with actress Amber Heard and then started dating the singer Grimes. 

Grimes and Elon Musk got the internet worked up over a joint appearance at the Met Gala.

Grimes and Elon Musk got the internet worked up over a joint appearance at the Met Gala.

Image: Carl Timpone/BFA/REX/Shutterstock

This was the year Musk recognized his own Twitter influence and started tweeting some bizarre posts and what he considers funny jokes.

By the way, Musk is 47 years old.

Elon Musk also used Twitter to announce a new name for his Boring Company’s flamethrowers.

This was just 365 days. What a year. 

Https%3a%2f%2fblueprint api production.s3.amazonaws.com%2fuploads%2fvideo uploaders%2fdistribution thumb%2fimage%2f86449%2fc2c5878c 3c78 4538 943e bdda0c16f1cf

Read More

from Trendy News Day http://bit.ly/2AhBqn5
via IFTTT